No. 24-6772
Rafael Dominguez v. United States
Tags: None
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) —convicted felon in possession of a firearm —facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment ? 2. Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violate the Commerce Clause when the government’s only jurisdictional burden is to prove that a part of the firearm crossed state lines at some point in the indeterminate past ?
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-05-27
Memorandum for the United States in Opposition of United States submitted.
2025-05-27
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 28, 2025.
2025-04-22
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to May 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 14, 2025.
2025-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2025 to May 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2025)
Attorneys
Rafael Dominguez
Brandon Elliott Beck — Brandon Beck Law, Petitioner
Brandon Elliott Beck — Brandon Beck Law, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent