Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear successive petitions for writ of habeas corpus when state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over a defendant's judgment of conviction

1i. a(vi£ncf a cle-Pe.^dar\F-£ Wl^e.-Hoev' cl £-FaFe. Com tr 4~Can 1 3otcl 3jv?enk & -p Cohvi cf/on Ho ct k c< r S U e. ^ 4* oH erivi f *. I l w Pc i £ ov\ t'vi cut iA-/ke n 4'ke. £-i-&-i-c.'S S-FccPuPe.^ do noH 5/\/e. Hkenn JuriSdt C"hiout over' Hke JSu6JeeH 1vncL 1 Z» Wlae-f ker He Fed I Cowrk KaS J uriSd fck io n Ho era 1 hear jw p_ S u cc e,S£ i\/c Pe-Fi-Ftoio -For Wr/H oF hctbaa£ CorPuS a claiv ^ -H^H kke SFahc <Wk did nok k I ■S la b J e c H kHer JurfSd t'ciFtotn ftV£ m ct 1Ho cte-Pe-MdaM-h'S Jud 5nnenH dH Corvi'cF/Dn Ho a. kari'ker H okPri£om +?e r no j^7 eM I -k k/kekker' Ue£t Con £F-rPu-piIre itiiir'ei Hke Federal ov\ Clour P Ho ■£ ^ e n He n c ei oH inn ftoH k^ve. £ukJeck £o ?jmkervene wker. ot 5Hike Co«r4 a <HX, CiFi Zen> Ho a kariHec Pr/’HnMenH wkem Hke SPa.deIHernn (Lour H o//W i^^ffer JunSdic-fion ±o JoI I I 1 J J J 2./Z5 0 '—1 kJ