Whether a criminal defendant's due process rights were violated by jury instructions that denied a necessary defense and improperly preserved objections

Q-rVeyi “M cfT d ,r* c t -pe s -t.yno/y y e oTcie^j <~e_ m eir O/^cl ■f Pi <H-o( ^CLoP & (0/yj ?/pi~ f~d> S' ~~f/\ -<j> cfS'’Z. O f~ S-elF-chfose. (t.P.C. cIaa. S <?.2(, <jW-*«. defe^re, ofneressr+y ~fh e c/."c;£ d/\ct / Iw ^ cUs^s ^ s4L j,FMes Ojas property ob-jecAed -fc> { a*d dkt a&jeo+rosx u a ? preserved }&si/\ Oid r & ( c<j> u r'l Q/tci i S Co (S r-t $ erf b y d&^y fnj cl jury rn s-'fruci'ro^&/1 $e^~defense Qn-d fl»cesr7"fy ?