No. 24-6797

Silas Bernard Peterson v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-analysis circumstance-specific-analysis criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance sex-offender-registration SORNA
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

QP: Did the district court err when it used a circumstance-specific analysis to determine that the petitioner's state conviction subjected him to sex registration requirements under SORNA?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

is: did the district court err when it used a circumstance specific analy sis to determine that the petitioner’s state conviction subjected him to sex registration requirements under SORNA?

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2025-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Silas Peterson
Stephanie Adraktas — Law Office of Stephanie Ardraktas, Petitioner
Stephanie Adraktas — Law Office of Stephanie Ardraktas, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent