No. 24-680
Dennis G. Collins, et al. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Key Terms:
ClassAction Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
ClassAction Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-02-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a United States Court of Appeals can sua sponte affirm a district court's judgment on Rule 9(b) and other grounds that were waived on appeal without giving the appellants an opportunity to amend their complaint
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a United States Court of Appeals can— sua sponte —affirm a district court’s judgment on Rule 9(b) and other grounds that neither the parties nor the district court ever addressed below or in the parties’ appellate briefing and, as a result, were waived on appeal, especially when the appellants had no opportunity to amend their complaint.
Docket Entries
2025-03-03
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2025-02-10
Reply of Dennis Collins, et al. submitted.
2025-02-10
Reply of petitioners Dennis Collins, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-01-27
Brief of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in opposition submitted.
2025-01-27
Brief of respondent Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in opposition filed.
2024-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2025)
Attorneys
Dennis Collins, et al.
Thomas Cusack Cronin — Winston & Strawn, Petitioner
Thomas Cusack Cronin — Cronin & Co., LTD, Petitioner
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Sandra Denise Hauser — Dentons US LLP, Respondent
Sandra Denise Hauser — Dentons US LLP, Respondent