Question not identified.

counts hm/is Adeptsdihe hddiN^ikftf ^o)eu^As4heoRi<yNAl ftp piIcAtale Time piEdicd REwvftins 'uNExpiREcPoathe AMsudatoR^Acts effect!ive d Ate, the ANvendNVENf Applies w&te&AthVekp SucKiWdiwtj negates at etKei?. Ex Pest fActb c&usideiwvtlons. Such holding Mbytes exist 1no,'jestedoo. Adc&wed SucK holding else, Nullifies testftNces wteuste teoNditiONs pfiEcedeMttb ARightof Acl'i ’oivi upon A liivbiUhg tREAted b'^ st/vrote' exist . Also, uahethER ae-tawctive AppIteAHoN of am enlARge^ent ©P^RAffiS Piles pect iv'ELY is no bnqpn Relevant! 3h& pnobktA isH\M sochhoiclkj /s viewed es “established United '■ States SupReiws Couat pvaecedewtte whicKthe DocteiNe of Shoe death Applies, <3hus ,tee;counts arc i»t^vWdin terns «sf Actions thatcm betatew. ^Ke hvAfteR, of ie^sslfttive exteNsiOMs of UMexpsRed statutes of OwitAticN Has N&tdiREcti^ beew Addressed big the dm ted States SopREwe' Coopt and is In Tire Meed of tUtefi cation , The ’mfttreR \s one <>f u&tiwM public iwvpoiitAMce *w*Hva'V» bg establishing cIbar paec&lENce on the issue, Twill pRjeveMtthe Doctrine of State Ostitis-f&nv\bEmA litockitNviMedjUjUi pRfivewt a twscMUUAge ofjustice mwvAMtj twsiawcES, AMdpR6SERV£ judieiAiUite^Rit^ b^REso(vjN^ disA3R£EMeNtsAN\cM^ ioweR eouRts ©wtKe issue , 1ou^hl^ ckfcif y'the iWA.rte.fx of legislative extensions of UMCXpited st/tiites df liwutAtious (All^uEsti oms pResENted Should pnesEwted ARE! It Dicl fKe United States Sup^eiwe Count"establish RoliMgpftecEdeNt 1m SiogwER. v> (taUfoRNUA; 53^ US, 60?(zees) iwith Regards. to "tegisteh'ue Extensions of uwexpifceci stati/tes of IteitAtious ? &) \Mh£M vested /AacRVEcl Rights EX('st ■, IS A Ceoftts pRewls^ /t At tefftOActiUE APpilCAtioM of Am EwlAR^EiweMt of ft tme period SOLELY on IKe basis ftiAt, on the a mbKidMEwts effective dAte the ©Rigteftl Applicable, fu’we belied RBWAltoed unexpt'aed, sufficient foR such aw AppUt/VKoKi; 3)X m this Instant ease/clid tiye cause of Action accrue ^ ut\E w the ©ffeviss was ftepoRted to A fftw £K)fbRL8Went ftQpMag ] H) (A)l\sMtheCAus6of AoWACCRoes,'^es tKeV^Kt of Action And tKe^Kt of exempt left opowA • l A Iihbilit^ w&ivteAbt^stAtute vest as Acceded Rights* ? 51) Wheiothe cause 0*5 acTion accrues /'does the orI^ina! Applicable tiwiE period vest as a sub. st/VN+ ’nm liiwibvTicw of both B\e liAbWitij AMd jhe Ri<^hT (‘tW-A CRlVMYlftt CASE."')? <o) As A sobs+Awtive ItWtAtioN of both the liability AMd the Ri^ht ,"does such A cottclVtioN CLUQE RefRo/votivE AppiicAtfoM of an A^ewdw\Ewt EwiAR^iN^+He ffwe pERiod ? 1) Whttfj the A?p\icA\j\e tilAE period EXPIRES,it lS AcCEpted tbAt PROSECUTION 0$ the eft^sE / \s TlN\E-SPURRED. CAV$e «sf ACtiojJACc.RCes ANdREtROACtive ftppbCAtiONcf ANEWiftR^EjAEU't to tHfi tilAE pERlod is PRECLUDED bECA»*S&.thB AppItCAble tm£ pEP-icd IS SpEC-if iC/llty Ked to A StA+utORlj TUfot ef Acti ON , °Zs the OFFENSE |keN CoUSl^ER&d To be Tl iAE CSARRE d ? " ' ■ * . • " 8) iobew vEsted/Aeaiued Rights exist, thwsuch Rights ke if/eioed /vs a defense ihAipneiiudes ReteoAdiVe AppUcAtm of an AMEwImut HxefimpoRied? 9) As a sobsfftw'Hv ’e ItWtA'ff'ow of hotA Hie liability And HheRjy lit, cam the t/Me peRiW i>6 Refi&RftEd ti as A ''si/itvie cf //MitAficMs defewso' 1 thufprecludes of Arts BiviiAR^ewvcNt To the t) r>AE peiCted ? io) If AN AMveNcb\t©iVj .Act EnIAR^N^ the ii(\AE period istc App)^ RFfl^ftetl d's jf.NECES^AUy tbAt on its elective cIaTe the ori^iNaI ApplicAhle fW pERicci regain uwexptaecf ? 11 )lf ah AMVEwdAfoR^ Act ENi/u^m^the Wm. pedoci is to App^Retao Actively , "Is it Also w.ecES * SAPv\^ +Ksvf ow its Effective cUte tbfe cause of Action has wot yet Acm>ed , u e,, f he cause of Action Has wot hc6N Repeated oR^sco/eRed 1'? >2f WKen AtiwiE pERiod is A V\ nUTaT'ioA of both the liftbilil^Awdi the ai$ht, AN^iehN be cousideaedsiih, stANtivE RAthER th/no pRceeduRM OR REMedi a! ) "Does it effectively fuwct.W as A statute oR rb~ \ Pose,thAt DVpwot be tciled oRExtENciedj msteAci of M£Re/ij a sf/vtute of HmitAiioMs"? \i) lu m iNstAKUHS wheRE i m the cause cf A