Whether the Court of Appeals improperly evaluated agency decision-making regarding proof of monetary receipt and mailing responses

No question identified. : m ■' r 5 $(JestrdfV s ft' < i r>i-' llMsA&jr ZooAlo^Apf^Jsfnr fh? Fer)w/A CiVcuCh : M-e cliScjrepQ-tf QJ rf-A/d c/^Ji h&./'/jfe* ly • c/?A£<s /VdTr}/5C.los^ H)4t~fh&y UJryyld b^USifYy /\/„. / Aifp&rtzAlTf/fVAl Ord-ejr /AcA^ecirlir/^ jh/s cAS-e • • COAy^ d/dlh^ (hurj'of App'ea-U 4<^r~e-e tO(Ai M-e , Aq&NCY Atfd /Vat~u)\ Ai rh-e. S^Qfir-e/^-e. Cc>l)A~rolirv ^ 'th&t' ■ ■ jln-e. Aty^N Cy 07usf'prg/fcl^ ^oj-^i ci^/ Y'f'prosf.fti^f Ar . jfiessdN d/J i/^c efi/-e y \ '', > U)k\f LOOulJ A Ace/ycy p^A/efe// dr cA<>^2 I/"Ife \f0Ov-5 Osva\\\[ aoN \ uo\Nr-,>ir->ir>l' N i> i> l-> t> hL> t> ese/yfeZ/Ve <9i/ap -e. I/K^y pu_t> C> s> hl> OJhy 6045 if permitted #uffi (9A/e <3£ jh^iir r^s.po/Ys<?s. ibTh-e. p<3 /Yr)f deky&cJ /W fW /??4i l__\ ___:_ hoi'fid/h J Hi<siT f^sf£> /V:C^ 'Yd&ys l/ffe.-e Aqe/V&y fT]/hle.d ... titWe^ 7c)4ys l/ftxzhl> * *>i-;> hi> !>* > <^ly CjJflcj jgf Y'Ae f\r<joNcy f&fcxr a!I H)^ qkTtA^ >NPlo/V-e </ pra/iQ 4-Aaf7^e^. Pr(\lA A/et/er Vidu) ngpoK Pr&Ne.'f i~tu)A '<;h->V >n h-L-'!'ISCJO^ > f'-. • > r> t> r-r--I.--": r-.>!?•■■■ id■ ■■ '• -H