Whether Dunn v. United States and United States v. Powell precedents allow habeas corpus detention based on inconsistent jury verdicts

Whether Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390 (1932), overturned by United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (1984), and United States v. Powell, self-restricted to this Court ’s supervisory power over federal courts, are authority to detain Petitioner on an action for habeas corpus based on inconsistent verdicts, as found below.1.) 2.) Whether under the United States Constitution and Supreme Court rulings on inconsistent verdicts, a verdict of acquittal as to an essential factual element precludes a verdict of guilt requiring the same essential factual element where the inconsistent verdicts were reached in the same trial. I f ( The Sixth Circuit is in error 31 32 Conclusion INDEX OF APPENDICES