Does CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO. allow a plaintiff to sue in federal court by claiming a due process violation due to an unconstitutional potential for judicial bias?

are ; Does CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., allow a plaintiff to sue in federal court by claiming that his right to due process was violated as an objective matter by allowing a judge or decisionmaker with an unconstitutional potential for bias to preside over the case? Does the RookerFeldman doctrine prevent such a claim? Did the Petitioner remove the case to the federal court after the 30-day statute of limitations if he was not a party to the unlawful entry and detainer suit, and was not properly served and/or was not given an opportunity to speak due to the case being sealed? Did the alleged conflict of interest violate the Sherman Antitrust Act sections 1 and 2. Specifically was this an unreasonable restraint by way of conspiracy, and an attempt to use the court as a monopoly in restraint of trade by using the two named judges to deny petitioner ’s attempt to set-off the judgment against him with the judgment petitioner has against Caliber Home Loans, Inc.? Did the abovementioned violate Petitioner ’s right to contract protected by Art. I, Sec. 10 of the U.S Constitution? Did this also deny petitioner ’s right to liberty to the extent that he was denied the right to contract?