No. 24-6816
Joshua Gary Anderson v. Fernando Garza, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conditions-of-confinement constitutional-suspension due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus writ-of-habeas
Key Terms:
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Federal court's refusal to permit a prisoner from challenging their conditions of confinement via a writ of habeas violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and possibly results in an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether a Federal court's refusal to permit a prisoner from challenging their conditions of confinement via a writ of habeas violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and corpus possibly results in an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus pursuant to United States Constitution ■ Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2? I fii ;
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-25
Waiver of Garza, Fernando of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Garza, Fernando to respond filed.
2025-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2025)
Attorneys
Garza, Fernando
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Joshua Anderson
Joshua Gary Anderson — Petitioner