No. 24-6820
David C. Lettieri v. Broome County Sheriffs, et al.
Tags: case-reopening constitutional-rights false-charges imminent-danger in-forma-pauperis legal-intervention
Latest Conference:
2025-05-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a case reopen when the reasons for no insurance are unclear, and do false charges constitute an imminent danger warranting legal intervention?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Questions, 24-cv*156 1. Does a case reopen when the issue to the reasons are none have no sinsurance to such? 2. Does revoke infornia paupris case count toward strikes? 3. Does a False charge be consured as "immidentrDanger since officer can contuine tooharass a pecsonwith false charges? 4. Does bad faith act'as an "immident danger ”?an
Docket Entries
2025-05-27
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2025)
Attorneys
David C. Lettieri
David C. Lettieri — Petitioner