No. 24-6826
Timothy W. Wright v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: active-interaction child-pornography criminal-law dubin-precedent statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the term 'uses' in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) requires an active interaction with a minor when interpreting the statute's actus reus verbs
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
is: In accordance with the method of statutory interpretation set forth in Dubin v. United States, 599 U.S. 110 (2023), should the term “uses ” be interpreted in the context of the statute and the other actus reus verbs listed in it requiring an active interaction with a minor. i £4 35 lO £
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent