Whether the Second Circuit erred in affirming a 92-month sentence without properly considering mitigating factors and procedural unreasonableness

1. Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in affirming the District Court's sentence of 92 months ’ imprisonment without properly considering mitigating factors and the procedural unreasonableness of the sentence. 2. Whether the District Court violated Petitioner's Due Process rights by improperly weighing aggravating circumstances not contemplated by the applicable sentencing guidelines. 3. Whether Petitioner's counsel was ineffective in failing to adequately challenge the procedural and substantive unreasonableness of the sentence.