Whether a state court's denial of a habeas petition based on procedural default can be overcome by a showing of actual innocence

DlA -Hie PeUiooer^ WiW <xDeta<»<r Cotn\ey*) $We & claim in h»s CowJ^'^ s’Votf'V ft«A fWn ■ S^WenV sUnj +Ufts ft finder +Lf jfe VJftS +o He?? Fel-l CiV.p. g^a) aU So dsl *« Ca,U e-^VV^A « W, lo 5»ak . claim ko ? 1 “f' I'." 1-) (Bell X llaaiic Carp v TwamUyl Ai|7 7 77. c?ii (a-*0.jkviea 7* C°u\^ <\feovso^\U jurjsV Cc?eiclu^e. +Ul*4he detaJanl/Tarvii 3 scVJh^) ev\SWe. A-l ^0^ AmencLrwen+ HjW^Wkick hnf>o6c$ q JtAyr necv-J. „J, „|, f..l7 F,“r “r*"1 u-s' *«'« ’ oin)j WI.A ,;^j.AepriVftW offood J