No. 24-6856
Curtis Hawthorne v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-issue judicial-review legal-jurisdiction pro-se-petition state-courts supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether conflicting state court decisions on a constitutional issue warrant Supreme Court review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. As there are conflicting decisions amongst state courts of last resort concerning a constitutional issue, in accordance with Rule X, this matter is now ripe for review from this Honorable Court. Curtis #632 158\Hawthorne ushabwrt,2.odt i. Curtis Hawthorne v. Tim Hooper, Warden
Docket Entries
2025-05-19
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2024-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2025)
Attorneys
Curtis Hawthorne
Curtis Hawthorne — Petitioner
Darrel Vannoy
Bradley Michael Scott — Orleans Parish District Attorney, Respondent