Michael C. Romig v. Kathy Brittain, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Was it constitutional for a court to procedurally default due to court-appointed counsel's action/inaction where constitutional rights were potentially violated?
1.) Was it constitutional violation/error for the U.S. District Court to procedur'ally default due to court appointed counsels action/inaction (Trial counsel, Direct Appeal counsel, PCRA counsel) , where raised the issue properly but counsel failed to address, omitted, and or failed to.properly argue the issue? Suggested Answer: YES 2.) Did court appointed counsels systematically violate constitutional rights by tactically maintaining State charges by causing denial of . the right to a fair trial before an impatial jury, to present, evidence and confront the evidence and witnesses against him, to due process of law, and equal protection of law, where was affected by Americas continuing neglect to provide adequate representation to indigent persons/defendants? Suggested Answer: YES 3.) Did. the Appeals Court error by finding my appeal untimely? Suggested Answer: YES