No. 24-6882

Michael C. Romig v. Kathy Brittain, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel due-process equal-protection fair-trial procedural-default
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was it constitutional for a court to procedurally default due to court-appointed counsel's action/inaction where constitutional rights were potentially violated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1.) Was it constitutional violation/error for the U.S. District Court to procedur'ally default due to court appointed counsels action/inaction (Trial counsel, Direct Appeal counsel, PCRA counsel) , where raised the issue properly but counsel failed to address, omitted, and or failed to.properly argue the issue? Suggested Answer: YES 2.) Did court appointed counsels systematically violate constitutional rights by tactically maintaining State charges by causing denial of . the right to a fair trial before an impatial jury, to present, evidence and confront the evidence and witnesses against him, to due process of law, and equal protection of law, where was affected by Americas continuing neglect to provide adequate representation to indigent persons/defendants? Suggested Answer: YES 3.) Did. the Appeals Court error by finding my appeal untimely? Suggested Answer: YES

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)

Attorneys

Michael C. Romig
Michael C. Romig — Petitioner
Michael C. Romig — Petitioner