No. 24-6887

Rufus Rivers, et al. v. James Smith, Jr.

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2025-03-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process fourteenth-amendment implied-agreement landlord-tenant procedural-rights property-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-05-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state Supreme Court's decision finding a landlord-tenant relationship based on an implied rental agreement violated the Petitioners' due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. :

Docket Entries

2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-06
Supplemental brief of petitioner Rufus Rivers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service
2025-04-25
Application (24A1025) denied by The Chief Justice.
2025-04-07
Application (24A1025) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Rufus Rivers, et al.
Rufus Rivers — Petitioner