No. 24-6902

In Re Sefe A. Almedom

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law federal-supremacy fraud-upon-court judicial-authority stare-decisis state-supreme-court
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ohio Supreme Court can override U.S. Supreme Court rulings on constitutional matters and revive unconstitutional statutes or sentences

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. ] According to Federal Law, the U.S. Constitution And State Statutory Laws. Does The State Supreme Court Of Ohio have More Power And Autnority than The U.S. Supreme Court? 2. ] When The United States Supreme Court Rule that a State Statute is Unconstitutional On Its Face. Can The State Supreme Court Of Ohio Revive that Unconstitutional Statute and make it Active Again? 3. ] When The United States Supreme Court Rule that _a State Sentence is Unconstitutional On Its Face. Can The State Sup reme Court Of Ohio Revive that Unconstitutional Sentence and make it Active Again? 4. ] When The Legislature Abrogate, Expung, Repeal Ar.d/Or Rescind Ohio Statutory Laws And/Or Statute. Can the Courts totally disrespect Legislature Authority, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision, an Rule as they see fit? 5. ] When The State Supreme Court Of Ohio Act Contrary to Federal / State Constitutional Law. Would this constitute Political Fraud Upon The Court And/Or Fraud Upon The Court? 6. ] Carefully Review EXHIBIT "F" Where this has happen on the face of The State Supreme Court Of Ohio's Entry August the 16th/17th, 1978. Political Fraud Upon The Court, and Must be Vacated based on The Federal Court's Inherent Power explained hereafter, to wit; 7. ] The Inherent Power of The Federal Courts is to Invest igate Action as to whether a Judgment was Obtained by "FRAUD !11 is bevond Question. EMPIRE COMPANY , 322 U.S. 238, 88 L.Ed 1230, b4 S.Ct. 9//. The Power to Unearth such a Fraud is the Power to Unearth it Effec tively.SEE: HAZEL-ATLAS GLASS COMPANY VS HART8. ] Every Element of the Fraud here disclosed Demands the Exercise of the Historic Power of Equity to Set Aside Fraudu lently Begotten Judgment. A Deliberately Planned And Carefully Excuted Scheme to Defraud not Only these common people of their Substantive And Proeedural Federal And State Constitu tional And Statutory Rights that !Jis" Protected by Federal Law, The U.S. Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States in the Instant Case In Chief. 9. ] Case Authority from The United States Supreme Court Or The Court Of Appeals, Federal Courts are bound, Under the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, to follow Chief Justice, Burger's Decision in LOCKETT VS OHIO. 98 S.Ct. 2954 as Unconstitutional>

Docket Entries

2025-08-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-07-24
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-04-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-01-15

Attorneys

Sefe Almedom
Sefe A. Almedom — Petitioner