Whether the District Court in Kansas denied pro se Plaintiff due process by declining to file a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to vacate orders issued by District Judge Holly L. Teeter due to potential judicial conflict of interest involving Garmin stock

are: Whether the District Court in Kansas denied pro se Plaintiff due process when 1. it declined to file Plaintiff ’s Rule 60(b)(6) motion requesting the Court to vacate all the orders issued by District Judge Holly L. Teeter because Judge Teeter violated 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(4); by receiving a "gift" of Garmin stock, by owning Garmin stock, and by profiting from the Garmin stock while she was presiding over the Jaiyeola v. Garmin International, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-2068 (D. Kan. 2020) lawsuit. Whether the District Court in Kansas abused its discretion with prejudice when 2. it declined to file Petitioner's Rule 60(b)(6) motion.