Does a non-capias warrant issued by a court lacking jurisdiction toll the 175-day speedy trial period when the defendant is located in another jurisdiction and prevented from being brought to trial

/. fOf 't'k purpose.i of hcfk sHfu-fag aW Cons bihbio„ H/ Speedy fr,\f, u/k-t„ in Ca r tstrakd defc-IAttf tS in Custidy in one Coi/nbfi hub has chores finding in t\nofh<jC-oonfg, t-5 Hie defendant Considered H i>e in l'0y 5Hdy ° <U dtfcied in fti. R-. Gam. b, P*.U & Cd)CusHdg, e/kicL 5 barfs fkecUck. for Speedy brio. I ? tig a. dcfedati Ilifo rt. serving fie Capias, ess,rntnf, uno irkir Co Vi Aj Jis Ikfc 3fidt ptrmiHcd ft calf months or even * oho is btC«*ie *>t >~> ' v , ^ yr u 5^4 fa itrn He Capias, tva. rr*nf s no dee <f Hanf&s, or arresf a. deft* «* w o ' drfW Ou^ Junv ^ l7S-dcg ^ fox/ j ^ ,, -Wfc , W, don ■»* ui C~Um *«. ^ * *>**•> A dfc&Urjt ^ p<r ^ * 1 H tf He i Hh fails H sent He Capias, oamrnf, notice cf c^rjts, friJ pie tad, dots He Stiti dor Verb ike rig kb ^ fU rtcapfun period f rstar^e of^stice occae uH n He W*»W ^nd +H de?«J*J ls nnon-fk ditij ivai nofw^naU And did PO+ prejudice <'<* f* S ^ ^ ^ ^ (,. tw «. n* «mv ^^177 “t" * A~/ w7a W V* *.“>*» *“*'*• *'"* ‘ * "•*** «f *’• ‘r ?■Jtf" 7 ri*^ 'f/*v ^ * 7. o.„ . — ~ —*~ T ;« „Cl»,-^ *U. ** ^ ^ ^ . /•!(» rtMuwS „a<f f*^,t'J'Ht °4r loCafed in in A. ft a deftnefani during Hi !7S~-dag speedy ttotibn ti OZriX in finding HdOr «rrt <5: pow a «v Hi HHKrftd from fti eH^tid re^u, etra.fi oA HMr +nl>uml ** proceed C-i+kC-0Vrf per evrian. t. Docs a naiSCarAajt <jf j±*bu -He tourf failed fo J audion in e*ussdf '**» Jiorisdietion^ fn>s