No. 24-6917

Edmond Stanley Adams, III v. South Carolina

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2025-04-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-claim criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the S.C. Supreme Court erred by barring Petitioners' Federal Factual predicate that he was denied effective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : j-lg-StlAttjLS Pe4-!i/oii>fir.<, Fed,efeu oa) IveQcj/og 1 mohil-£<a..fctye5ji jq£-.£1 ojjm .saL&j£_ OrOcS. UL TOM _ ^_ 1... 0 t &_X<3_A.e _ ___ 1 ^^l^^£cAi^A^ms.s/jJ ,MAicA..A£Jku^AJ. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hvft^ he ukaS cLwtdi effective cusstsla*)ce of Counsel einj lots EirS-t n,^&n)l / _ TMi]/! pxe<i>! lj)JJ!.,rn.6-j \n. 802C& uj.S 33L DAtinelLSWf Fad-ugjlj>r eJjlca)4-c l AJfSeJ anj Jo is -PirS-t cuppeMl ulhe/J £uS GootoS&i do /<? M/sHe/ijiMe/oJ' . lc-p/o^ ujJoerJ '/’herew Of..■Gjg.nwcuLcj^^ aJf&mpf to r.&pai/ r ^h)& prarJScr/p j ,_ _ Peifttoners Pajc-tu ailpreJjt'cr±jf& -flux)! k)& DiJjJioeXjCXvX. J)jJxflJjdl Jdcn/e,..^ XLa, Post {jo*iufch'o/> j P&IU-f {Pck)cu^ j>U ?_ >upi-£^e Cruit^r &nor hij (^.trlfo^ }&tiitOtOeK ■PaiC^ocdl j>r/>JjtCcQ-b& i^eoi _ iXlnusk.^aiM^eX A^llcojra Cout\yj ur/sJj/C'faon? io <kljuJila»t& ftsJ-lJrfMers a^peojl, Di'jj-Hua flour} error hi haur^i Pef/fiWois /zui.-Jogjl ^mXttAushb -fUgit //_ %ucftJa)l trier -bo put J'hej mfiar aJHalhoiO h)earlA>n backs OaJ fh& Jo/j poriel*] _ _ / -fJledL 'lt XL_ IJJLeXxJ! S£Ju px&c'i.e JSL iurtsJi/G'l/cwaJ I c Petibortfif Shuc kUMS_4? uxoasd u_ h) cuXuJjceoire (biz-howa j'/'/ajj toLe^y JuAs //jArchne^h 1 \L__ f)lJj we..Ce/derail ScSI/oaK Covrt af fliclola^ J, tics _ p£--ajJ^vALcjA>L<k_ JhXhb/je ’!S-J.tl^L is yi4 Spec/eu! Couaj^ Jaj omj _P>_Cji/slc&ajliX kOAQJporJ Dytlvorj i' f'o fU(Z SLC* Ce>A& __\±^ii:mdZA. d X_V.__ j)jjL^KcJjC(OCfojj SeS5to/^J CoDr't cF /bfchl<itOcL Ci _ \urIStLtchorJ io (VeL'iOiLt eepee ffipftt n A^kAfjJkl _ )^YX ^fror b^ lotr^j Peht/OrJerS Fotcfuajl jiffidjco -he C]t>coi /U >cl uJcuS ’jiUiuhJL uOtih Mtn^gerj H> tt>G &,>rt uibo Ji/A Ndf lr\lPnrr/\aJ'hJorJ f.arJts 7ULieftl AJo \jjj:lsJsZchbi*L ___ 10). Preh /cJ! A4ohofO heart*! q /oalcLfj&eS &t An).. L.(#t& 1 nttg£' -jumr. 31. a / TbigJmogjedLlio _3 C^yyP(!^i^o^£f ‘) ^£> uJtfj /ir.fcjifviotocL .$fArdj^_JLiGiW5 y3II^o_.J^^ CerHoiarl L__/jbU^M —Oojxii je.flJjt5__3 _ ~ fir _ _ _ _ ^1 ».)j~rocLochofO1 1)1. I A 3 V 0 b.aJjaJSa _JMmjLJlcLi 10 HoMCjvJj:ml 30 ur (AjABLE OF Author ities ) U&l Ace VS-SU-c 30.S S.C.m^OH S.£.z<L.3U (S.C.mi) _ 16-XL AsLujeII U,. 61 IrttK Aon -) 33BacniW 13. fiotl ^soa) v^. 'fatiFucKp Hte ii.S.7^106 s.chnmt mo)_ Bftyt ..V£.U'$. jM5/U.S.7B j£l5 S.ChGM (im*) _ [Bracf 1/5. MraLrtSo^£ 07 /l5.£/9 ;//3 S.Ci, 1710 Cim) ___ 1/5, 97 A A /13a l/?7?) Bu+ier V5 Jlook J03 S.CM g JV U.jU, %1 C$,G. Mo) ___ "ofroktf V5,Co ch rani.3&9 0.5,50^ 8A S,ChVM (l%X) _ OUk^vs. Ltt,fzsi as, }}53 s.ch HGS (ini') _ Casks VS,tiS l5HU,S.H85 tll1 S,Ci. /73il/W) _ £x Paris De Map 3 5*.C, 567 C $>C. }%7SiA)_ Ex Porte Lip 7 S.L 313. Csx. M76) _ EvIHs vs.LocepH w u,s.3S7 ;m sta.33o C ms^> _ EQrehcu '^ Cojmor^ Via u.s.m^s s.ci. 153.S Ci<ns'> .IJhdLs__ V5. TJLU, 586 11,11 3£; /39 £,CF 738 C Jloiti ___ _ Qlleo^ VS.\JcoirJu}r^t T3U i).S,335; 23 S.C+.7U, 0%3) GjJl^£2^J^/i^j _ _ Hivzs j/5, SiaH. m s.e. :u. %&.££,. il, 177 C $,c.jidjlh ')__ jkrwhs_-V5^^ VS.Ddso^ 'J F. t’lQS (^Gh. ALoni) VsJ.C.Pcft. oF CorrechoM t3lU lC.mi733S l6.Jl<L.0Ui (S.C.2QI& /330 U 11 i reader _£3. ___ ___JQ.zl2>. ___ _ 3_5___ H .11 n Js-JU yarzaj iLL ... ill 10 7Qfli2flJ 15 Sh^ek l^iSL OS H12.J 131 S.ok iIVteoil) 17-33 ___ 11-___fArtrl VS, H luioci TV £4*1 _lowaj VS. %var s5Hl U.S, 11 } )XH S,Ot. 1311 tZOOl ) 1oW5Qft3_^L/ J5,J33 a,.s,jQ Lm£) _1-5AO If1H?is?X.Ki!t LaU-foo-P VS.C&rt.Mori Gotp. SSd as, gj. Ill S.ch SSI (jbcni) -.LMrJjUDj. /ifiiJ.iSotfiI Cforool) I31s S U.S. 127 f 1203} _ (ZOIOY I7}3i} ^3V Jj)e/aJ/.5jM4 f33Ji,C^4513 M.zl 753../S..C, im) AQl^ZIU ___&Q. M Pajj-QrO te.Al&uiXnr^ HS (I.S. 513} m £.0t I37i (.1920 s) Porka VS, lUk^ SteOS.ty i/3 i.a5/7 ^ 111 A')_ PazJbMVS./iZ'jrer40 10_ Vay F,3cl 303 Cy^tb. slops ') H~7~ . PgGpkJteAl^^ _ _ Potoall V6. A\aJb<

Docket Entries

2025-05-19
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-22
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina to respond filed.
2024-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2025)

Attorneys

Edmond Adams
Edmond Stanley Adams III — Petitioner
South Carolina
Don Russell Barlow IISouth Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent