Whether Uber's use of generative artificial intelligence to manipulate driver earnings and employment status constitutes an unlawful labor practice that violates independent contractor rights

Only one 1. Why 3 Judges enforced their opinion and Mandate, but paid no attention, to the Document filed 2 days before: "The Uber's Tip Steal Scheme and Against the Law Harassment Policy Enforcement Cycle" By imposing me technical protocols, allowing Uber: Steal tips massively to their own Drivers; Harass us, and even fire us with no reason; By means of Generative Artificial Intelligence, which none of them knows anything about; Because there is no clear precedent about it in any U.S. Federal Court: Forcing me to go out of Court: Requiring me Silence, called non-disclosure; With the lawyers representing Uber, That was allowed by the Court to get away In spite of Their unlawful practices? Note: The graph showing this cycle is easier to see. It was added separately in case it is considered an image: I respectfully ask, to be included after the Question presented or to be visible within the Docket Search at the Supreme Court of the United States Website: The Removed Images Exhibit is in vertical form and separated from the Petition, as required. It shows visually what the