1. At issue herein is whether the District Court erred by allowing evidence obtained in violation of petitioner's constitutional rights by State officials to be introduced at petitioner's Federal trial and whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in failing to correct the lower court's error.

2. Whether the lower courts' ruling that petitioner's counsel offered effective assistance of counsel conflicted with the requirements of effective assistance of counsel set by this Court and the United States Court of Appeals

Whether the District Court erred by allowing evidence obtained in violation of petitioner's constitutional rights and whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in failing to correct the lower court's error, and whether the lower courts' ruling on effective assistance of counsel conflicted with established legal standards