Whether the initial Court violated Article VI, Cl. 3 of the United States Constitution by denying Petitioner's statutory right of abatement and the U.S. constitutional rights

x. the /st / t/«./ Coust e.sne.dL /si thext the f/exth eo. cL County £em Co ssisn <xn dsn en t ssionuss/esit does slot Violate£he £sto-b/ish *r>enb C.I<\u.S ti. c\_n d Pct/t/osier vVcx spc^c£~ vS\rot\^f*A.fly znJiA.re.cL by f 6-S .display on public. property c^nd tb<*$ Cf,u<xrc^.n £e.e~c£ /n 6A>e_ /fee. fyerCi.se. CZIcSc. iro t~€-mov&/ Whether the initio./ Court i/iolcxted Article. VI, Cl3. of thte Usi!ted. Sto.te5 Constitution i>y denyintf Pet) £t ones his S>batcx£o ry n^lit O-babement c>p a. o.n in jo-red pas-try cxnA the. U.SCop force. lend exAAonto-na. Jass .<3.. Wh ether the. initio./ Court: Violo.te.cL Article. VI, Cl. 3. o/~ the. LCs)/ ted S to. be. S Const! tutio Sto.tests, thcxt Conplic.ts VV/th CS fk-ch3. rt by enpo<~Cmcy <X 3teste. Crim! na.1 I Crlm i /i o.l -S to.bis. be. , ero. 7. Whether Petitioner VJa.3 denied /its, thixtb Amend merit. ri <^h t tofa.ee. hiS <XC.CLU.Sexcot trio./. 5. Wh ether petit/osier WaS /eft with a.n u.n c-onSt/ tutiosio./ Conviction based On the fa-Ctuo./ C/rCccmS tcxr\ceS of^ this fo-r t/ Cc*./o.<~ Ca.Se.. i