No. 24-6945
William Eugene Mulligan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: None
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2025-05-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Does the mere existence of a police policy allowing the impoundment of a car obstructing traffic authorize a prolonged warrantless seizure of a car under the “community caretaking” doctrine of the Fourth Amendment? 2. Does a note to a bank teller in and of itself demonstrate that a bank robbery was committed by “intimidation” under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) when neither the note nor any action taken by the suspect demonstrated an intent to use violent physical force? ii INTERESTED
Docket Entries
2025-05-05
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
2025-04-15
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
William Eugene Mulligan
Hanni M. Fakhoury — Moeel Lah Fakhoury LLP, Petitioner
Hanni M. Fakhoury — Moeel Lah Fakhoury LLP, Petitioner