No. 24-6988

Ricardo Edwin Lanier v. Justin Burns, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-04-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: court-procedure due-process evidence-interpretation factual-dispute summary-judgment witness-affidavit
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district and appellate courts erroneously discredited the petitioner's account by improperly relying on a notarized affidavit and overlooking key evidence in the videotape

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : 3o VVotAW A’^cA* CoorV as Ufel\ <*$ AW o^9fc\W. J^fe. teWar^-WrS Vt Wi and dn\i' Cxx«.d<v»t\33 AW v/^ifeo Aocda^fc, arvl oW'\Qfcri Ca^WAWsD OJ& WA'o^ers vecsWn o? Q^eA-Vs Card 3 f Cts u>elV OS \o\er\V*&Aa\\l cwerWtad IhlB rOcttoUl. ISO AVFlDtW/To^ PETIf/Of^lS 1 W/FE WHO WftSTHB ALLEGED VICTlfr^ AW^P&V'Manfcr ovc^aes AWAW feasor^ WW Ca»H-j felled o<\ +o AlsueAYb Wis acccua^ UfEfUOS 6ftS|C SonrroftM ^UDGfOEnJT PMajuPLES ArtfB CjOfjilWArJTi (\EVHftSftL • V\&re -W d\SVp,dcdoc V ovS UJ&W as C£orV WA v CoDMerW^d doc^fcMuAvcNxU a/nfrrp^ZLt) ftyFiOftvjfT Ofr LftK&Hft ftJAJcH; +W OsSiSeiVt aAli S^rWw^AVe. eanJAreH of AW dr^dWV uWck ' \ (\c\vdtAi Codm^SSoW; WV' rrorH AWr \rAcodX£A,€L£S^£>nS of rr>ofer\ed WoA m^urd^AVe \Wdtrd \|\ Hjje&eO &oW CiwrW a2»u a d' sAorAed WAiV.oral SjrxMtwn \jAam*daUd**&« W1 s (fchorwdA c AW ql ecu rV m/sA CLedW 4W OJCcojoA o£ AW WAs oA -L>rrmri SudaftenW AWW CatfW A»d i r\ AWJrW*Ax AW W SWAVi Vo^pW and'As orders PnaW Ice ffetfsrS&i. Tk> (X^sVr cA cwrA <ns ujeft os AW aHfclbAe co^cV VxAVv erftfr&cuslf ttvisAaK Qaj&ooS. CDr\c.Ws»t>r\S frtjds in Hl^LaS a.\e3a\ c©f>c\v>5\on« See .F*. oA 0-30 5W\c&AW « **vjoVer6 a$ Ve.ct AVe recced C£*Wir& Oa UAcW\\e^ftd \s) AeoV^Pe taVA^rvttJ AW &Jer*Vs xrvH^jesAr'or^tJE Ousf anW ccfedW AVe PW aV^ ver yU/> cA AW -Wb h) AW edVerA \\~ it roA oxdaidvtVcd \ri AW vufcoAafo % PeMrWrs AW cemrtcuftA *fkdAUVt QiSfenk W*adW*K rttex tAuntt Caa \& *S60r\ j WV WW CxjrW \c\WnA«cK\iaAH OierWcfelAVcr^ (\s fb^AtdcMA bt 4W fi^BKatSC.Tle W*iAr \J AWd AW v\d&o Rotk^slt does t\)V V^odarM'f fcsWfe\*vdn AWdocA o\rcjja\SAanceS a>Ar*ari W Ptd'AdrfcrS QtxwnV. T}v^ Wrk Ca)fAs Grted u>»Wa St/mrtafl SVondcdS (xd OtldfAd CpPxCJrr^ -WcArucd 9(5S vV cM»rV CWk3 <yerm»red CjCjJ fWifd JbesArvA'cid HUr tfciacA V%ccfc5 3 WrloellcalW 4kro^Wd' Com ^ <& 10 e*S \o focgfe<k ^\ec u)os or'a.ooWi^.Nel^ OTrTES OlSIWa CO«r mm Mstfucr of ioo«^v\ cmourja <^h^ilib> D ca5<l (v)arre.', V« &J& a)S gL^\o\ <Vta-^v/K3> « ift'-'fo" '~u P\„\^ j4p ft V iPiflyi FO '1^» P.ft.C\& ?.An)£ CjSPS -or^'raWi VAST oSfettV cm tt-*v-K> >* tTVlt UnllrtO SmEicxise'H* l:*^-<jJ-QOO'1$f-P rA Oec*Ae*L' S^hlh',J ■‘°PS tC . V..*> ' ^TVLs mcjcfer ux& c-oopt o? wPtfiLS Toft. T&. V<xcw aMxilTl ^£y.KrM> :^£2tt£CAS£ Vn\^W ^ V/ VWiAeA' WW^l ; \-&£iLLB aJT ' tk\Lfoftg) F-ft»)W Lftf\>l£E* fc&PtU-EtS * AOjTO j ^(WE fe. i^a«Y>Wf\ft5 : ^^a^^ V ^ f-JrtWfeiYh 9af^S 5 fVJS 5P<M& G-f^ 56P^es 5-^5 VP^si FiWi M-Sf %,5-» f*,Wl l-sr^ \3 f'Afe^ {d-(o-W-> \fe Fileat J~5'W-> v] f;Wl 7-n-j* n-v FV*t ^ f'M o-^i F»W 33 f;Wl S3 Fli^i 5B^ FU £>H f'Ae<LftOcoopertV GocurrfertV V"\ ^^cjrrersf tiOCjJ Orfcr\V Docury-trAr \k>CJrrtrA\WjfTSAV OcDcuftenV QoO^CttrsV Vi0a/rr%f^ ftoojrvtrA ^^flujfVcrA t^OCjL/'Ttr^r F AcA&6-1 FAoJl tkXA^erVr Sfr'k FW Vd-'JO -k} * i^dTo^XiH) VeWfrait ’^a cWKV rV^slflc^ cfcWra 'UCAoJ^U Vtf0&&7 VrVW ^*<hn cWV. VI 'KWi^'li) VtoOSMl C«a «vA bWU * WJiujtd. TO COmeUlnJT .f cWs sU*a V c«*e«r*IKs-se JfcVe feVA-lV. m Vi Jr m .f ow i CxAjrV ftertJL \ »\ eV' rtV^ 7-H-30. SHo-J£> \0'lS'W3P^^ei A Vk' "iKlS J^nON-V Sb-ltfcrs i0'3o-^3 Jo5s>^3iLo^ fflcWD MS (W or> &aA\ Po& fi\V 4l^lb^dbcjrtcAf SCJ» —fl^s-i~ u/^s jea ^n//tx fk tfecfcrtl buf ^ fwJre’.rfr^u'C^ vr\ -U\^ fOoajr>OS?t t * • fete H <$ Zd "I' C-oAetxV-S r£ ft_9Qaf\<X*v ’k ft«*K$~7IS5 MfedU ciwrY-fer-VW H\W I'K-WtaM C\ccj ,»\ u)e <*&'ifrr\ Wt &WGa\e<lfex>^ ordtrS* UM£®. v'.&j&vrt ft/ov \\*9rw*0(xri8~t*fis ivJ,t, aAC. fwxM XI %oXk; S>^A, V\ ^053; nJOu. fc Ozj^S)* * * J J "Th& Mj\W c_lr<iA\ GciMot aftkcAs ^or ^e\>ecux «&• aA \W Al^eV-ws c?+Vfc ferai ' ,5TYuxjcJC£j Vtami c*t«5l .Server A>^3^ K9SfW\* izKViMh. JowrvenV V' OMfcfc!, ft\\ dcLit^ ^SkT^i \f\ kvjJcW aj"e W^eVt ^\$flU$S4) ^or^obWtE 4© 6\c*ie a. cWv n\^ 0^ChA $or $cLt&'W' S To^rVU eSJCfi^iOt ^wt-£. C\ou«\ txQc^ (Jbfeivla^J VYeV \rvW (<tacA CA^offe*** 'kVK-'Mtt eXocam^ r% (ml -\Wf GfcM' s 0f^3L U VereVl \W tk^ervbnPs ^1 CroWois "9or S^rv^qrf ^xA^rreM* »S G(M} a)TE0 OcV.orN iS DUrnltti) u>A:V AocartotV Vi 1 owm&;TKd fUrjW's nxjUor\ cJW vCV

Docket Entries

2025-09-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-08-14
DISTRIBUTED.
2025-06-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 14, 2025)

Attorneys

Ricardo E. Lanier
Ricardo Edwin Lanier — Petitioner
Ricardo Edwin Lanier — Petitioner