No. 24-6991

Jessica L. Morris v. Jeremy Howard, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether certiorari is appropriate due to alleged constitutional violations in criminal proceedings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE BECAUSE PETITIONER WAS DENIED HER RIGHT TO PRESENT A DEFENSE IN VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS V, VI AND XIV?I. IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE BECAUSE PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT VI?II. III. IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THE PROSECUTOR ’S WITNESSES WERE ALLOWED TO INVADE THE PROVINCE OF THE JURY BY NARRATING THE VIDEOS ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS VI AND XIV? IS CERTIORARI APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF ROBBERY OR UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT TO SUSTAIN THE JURY'S VERDICT IN VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS VI AND XIV?IV.

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2025)

Attorneys

Jessica L. Morris
Jessica L. Morris — Petitioner
Jessica L. Morris — Petitioner