No. 24-6993

Deon D. Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: disqualification due-process fifth-amendment judicial-bias mandamus racial-bias
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the D.C. Court of Appeals deny Applicant's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by not including 743 Fairmont Street NW LLC as a party in the proceedings, thus rendering the proceedings and its rulings void?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

are as follows: 1. Did the D.C. Court of Appeals deny Applicant ’s Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by not including 743 Fairmont Street NW LLC as a party in the proceedings, thus rendering the proceedings and its rulings void? 2. Does the D.C. Court of Appeals ’ failure to include 743 Fairmont Street NW LLC as a party in the proceedings have the appearance of racial bias? 3. Does Respondent ’s conduct presented in Petitioner ’s Third Motion to Disqualify Judge Donald W. Tunnage. and Fourth Motion to Disqualify Judge Donald W. Tunnage. qualify as conduct that might cause the average person, fully informed to reasonably question the Respondent ’s impartiality, thus requiring Respondent ’s disqualification from proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)? ii

Docket Entries

2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-04-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2025)

Attorneys

Deon D. Colvin
Deon D. Colvin II — Petitioner
Deon D. Colvin II — Petitioner