Whether the warrantless seizure of a phone during a murder investigation violated the Fourth Amendment when police lacked probable cause, failed to limit the seizure, and detained the phone for an extended period

Whether the warrantless seizure of Alsham Laster’s phone, during a murder investigation, violated the Fourth Amendment when: (i) police did not have probable cause that evidence of the murder was on the phone ; (ii) law enforcement failed to secure Laster’s phone in a manner that was reasonably limited and tailored to the need; and ( iii) the restraint was not limited in time and scope, avoiding a significant intrusion, when police took twenty two (22) hour s to obtain an approved warrant ?