No. 24-7026

In Re Andre Monteek Edwards

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-04-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: claim-adjudication district-court judicial-jurisdiction legal-finality sixth-circuit writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Edwards has a clear and indisputable entitlement to a writ of mandamus declaring the district court's failure to adjudicate the merits of his seventh claim voids the Sixth Circuit's orders for lack of jurisdiction

Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Edwards has a clear and indisputable entitlement to the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS DECLARING THAT SINCE THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO ADJUDICATE THE MERITS OF HIS SEVENTH CLAIM,* IN THE INTEREST OF SECURING CONFORMITY WITH THE RULES OF FINALITY, THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S ORDERS IN Edwards v. Nagy and In re Edwards are both VOIDED for lack of jurisdiction ? ii

Docket Entries

2025-06-23
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-04-08
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2025)

Attorneys

Edwards, In Re Andre M.
Andre Monteek Edwards — Petitioner
Andre Monteek Edwards — Petitioner