Whether the installation of a pole camera monitoring a residence for over 13 months violated the Fourth Amendment right to privacy and whether a zoom lens attachment altered the constitutional analysis

WHETHER THE INSTALLATION OF A POLE CAMERA, WITH A ZOOM LENS, WHOSE PURPOSE WAS TO MONITOR PETITIONER'S MOVEMENTS FROM AND TO HIS RESIDENCE, TWENTY-FOUR HOURS A DAY, AND SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, FOR A PERIOD OF TIME IN EXCESS OF 13 MONTHS, VIOLATED HIS 4th AMENDMENT RIGHT OF PRIVACY? ASSUMING THE POLE CAMERA DID NOT INFRINGE ON PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY, DID AN ATTACHMENT TO THE POLE CAMERA OF A ZOOM LENS, CHANGE THE EQUATION? 02/27/2025