Whether the evidence is legally sufficient to sustain multiple drug and firearm-related convictions and whether the imposed sentence violates due process

I. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Drug Traffic Conspiracy. II. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Maintaining a Drug -Involved Premises. III. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine. IV. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Possession with Intent to Distribute Marijuana. V. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug Traffic Crime. VI. Whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to sustain Sutton’s conviction for Convicted Felon in Possession of a firearm. VII. Whether the sentence imposed is longer than necessary to achieve the goals of sentencing, in violation of Sutton’s right to due process.