No. 24-7048
Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola v. United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-06-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. District Court abused its discretion by rejecting a pro se Petitioner's motions and denying constitutional rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Whether the U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids, Michigan, abused its discretion with prejudice and denied pro se Petitioner constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, and first amendment rights when it ordered that all of Petitioner's motions in the Jaiyeola v. Toyota Motor N. Am., Inc., et al., l:17-cv-00562 (W.D. Mich. 2016) lawsuit must be rejected and returned to the Petitioner.
Docket Entries
2025-10-23
Case considered closed.
2025-06-23
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 14, 2025, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2025.
2025-05-02
Waiver of right of respondents Toyota Motor Corporation; Aisan Industry Co., Ltd. to respond filed.
2025-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Toyota Motor Corporation; Aisan Industry Co., Ltd.
Robert Allen Brundage — Bowman and Brooke LLP, Respondent
Robert Allen Brundage — Bowman and Brooke LLP, Respondent
United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent