Whether the COVID-19 pandemic and federal lockdowns constitute a valid basis for equitable tolling of filing deadlines in a pro se employment discrimination case

1. Did the Pandemic (Covid-1 9 Federally Mandated present a considerable factor in the Equitable Tolling of Time, Reasonable Diligence and the Inaccessibility of the Clerk ’s Office (as defined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(A)(3)) regarding TIMELY FILING judicial documents during the year 2020? 2. Does the Respondent ’s (Methodist Health Systems) Motion to Dismiss based on failure to state a claim in a timely manner (180th day limit, with documents acknowledged by EEOC on 181 st day) SUPERCEDE the “Right to Sue” granted by the EEOC for the particular claim? 3. Does suspected Judicial Misconduct or Failure to Address Facts/Motions constitute a justification for a new trial in a different venue? 4. Was the Magistrate ’s decision to Dismiss with PREJUDICE the appropriate and justified ruling by the US District Court of Northern Texas? 5. Does a Right to Sue issued by a federal agency grant a petitioner of the court an actual actionable right to sue in this case? This ruling BY THE SUPREME COURT shall have NO BEARING on whether the respondent Methodist Health Systems has broken any employment laws nor the respondent ’s guilt with regards to my initial claims before the lower courts for WRONGFUL TERMINATION, RETALIATION BASED ON GENDER DISCRIMINATION. 1 PANDEMIC PRO SE Covid-1 9 and the Federally mandated lockdowns effect on equitable tolling and the inaccessibility of the clerk ’s office for filing claims Willie Lee HavMmeri (Petitioner) vs Methodist Health Systems (Respondent) Writ of Certiorari , United States Supreme Court I simply challenge the Dismissal with Prejudice based on the inability to state a claim. The Justice that I seek and askthe United States Supreme Court is for the ability to introduce my claim in another court, outside the influence of Methodist Health Systems. Either on the State or Federal Level. Listed Parties Petitioner: Willie Lee HavMmeri Respondent: Methodist Health Systems (MHS) John M. Barcus, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak& Stewart PC, Employment Lawyer representing Methodist Health Systems (MHS)