Were due process Constitutional rights violated by respondent's agency proceeding and did the DC Court of Appeal unconstitutionally exclude petitioner's substantial evidence

I) Were due process Constitutional rights violated by respondent's agency proceeding ? II) Did DC Court Of Appeal violated petitioner's constitutional rights by excluding his substantial satisfactory evidence that supports his case? Ill) Did petitioner's substantial satisfactory evidences that was excluded unconstitutionally by respondent do in fact supports a reasonable mind to reach a conclusion in favor of petitioner? Table Of Content