No. 24-7073

I. M. v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2025-04-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: confinement constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus mental-health-code probable-cause
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment FirstAmendment Punishment Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Illinois mental health code violates constitutional due process rights through arbitrary confinement without probable cause hearings and post-judgment relief mechanisms

Question Presented (from Petition)

The Illinois mental health and developmental disability code should be held 1. unconstitutional as to violate habeas corpus doctrine and individual Constitutional due process rights at the expense of allowing Illinois DHS and Hospital Emergency rooms, per unadjudicated ‘inter alia ’ medical opinion, to be above the law with no probable cause hearing set within 24-72 hours or within 5-day max? This is part of a post-judgement wrongful confinement relief petition nullified by the Illinois Courts. Post-Judgement wrongful confinement relief petition should be obligated to be heard by 2. the Federal Courts upon original jurisdiction created under Federal Question that this Writ of Certiorari allows consolidation of wrongfully severed Illinois mental health cases; Or be heard in State Courts when the State refuses to allow due process for wrongful confinement relief as part of 5th and 14th due process equal protections for incarcerated prisoners versus mental health defendants? Habeas Corpus Doctrine or U.S. Bill of Rights should then be held unconstitutional or held ambiguous in modem day time for mental health defendants prior to commitment or upon post-judgement wrongful confinement relief? 4th amendment per 5th and 14th due process right should end arbitrary mental health arrests from home as seen with an emergency petition that does not immediately schedule a probable cause hearing within 24-72 -hour maximum time? Unconstitutional to allow the Illinois Courts to make a post-judgement petition or appeal 3. into a “live” mental health case, when one has already been discharged, as a due process violation per ones right to object under the Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disability Confidentiality Act, per confidential records created, and Illinois Mental Health and Developmental Disability Code? { ■ } Csisq #24M7 8th amendment Cruel and Unusual punishment and excessive fines applies to the Illinois 4. Mental Health and Developmental Disability Code when the State of Illinois forces unconstitutional excessive payment or liability to innocent defendants as a form of indefinite punishment or debtor prison? An instant punishment per a religious healing tax upon the mental institution bill as a concern for the 1st Amendment for a discharged defendant defeating a mental health petition? This liability assumes guilt on the innocent mental health defendant before it is paid. It also allows indefinite confinement even after mental health discharge due to a medical bill owed is an insinuation of‘guilty by association ’ per the fabricated medical records created without a mental health code expungement policy of records for the innocent discharged or a lack of post-judgement wrongful confinement relief for those wrongfully confined under the State ’s mental health code. 5. Unconstitutional for the State of Illinois Judicial Courts to strike or waive a post judgement wrongful confinement relief petition, per 5 th & 14th due process right to quasi criminal jurisdictions, as part of the 9th and 10th amendment for Individual citizens to claim wrongful confinement relief as a Constitutional right rather than an equity right under State mental health or civil codes? 4th amendment right to privacy applies to unjustified capture of innocent defendants that proves no probable cause was warranted or adjudicated? Wrongfully confining a dual Federal and State citizen in a mental health institution is equal to deeming a person is a slave or involuntary servant as a concern for the 13th amendment and can be a form of cruel and unusual punishment per 8th amendment even if licensed Illinois professionals believe they are providing a medical service or benefitting the People of Illinois as to wrongfully accuse someone as a public threat or mental illness without a proper due process hearing? This U.S. Supreme Court case has original jurisdiction due to the consolidation of wrongfully severed { ■ } Case #24M7 mental health cases and judicial order

Docket Entries

2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-04-21
Motion Granted.
2025-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2024-02-21
Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2025)

Attorneys