No. 24-7076
Delowar Mohammed Hossain v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: classified-information criminal-defendant-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fifth-amendment sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Fifth Amendment Due Process or Sixth Amendment effective assistance of counsel claim arises when security-cleared defense counsel are not given access to classified information directly relevant to an issue being raised on appeal?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a Fifth Amendment Due Proce ss, or a Sixth Amendment effective assistance of counsel, claim arises when security-cleared defense counsel are not given access to classified information directly relevant to an issue being raised on appeal? DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-23
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2025)
2025-04-17
Application (24A983) denied by Justice Sotomayor.
2025-04-11
Application (24A983) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 13, 2025 to June 12, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Delowar Mohammed Hossain
Michael Keith Bachrach — Law Office of Michael K. Bachrach, Petitioner
Michael Keith Bachrach — Law Office of Michael K. Bachrach, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent