Whether the court committed plain error by failing to adhere to constitutional requirements for judicial appointments and oaths of office

1. As a matter of Law, did the court commit plain error when it failed to adhere to the Constitutional requirement of an Oath of Office for persons appointed as a judicial officer of the several states pursuant to Article VI, clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America and Article XV, Section 7 of the Ohio Constitution? Where the magistrate did not have a proper Oath of Office, Petitioner argues that the magistrate was not lawfully on the bench and did not have lawful authority to act in a judicial capacity. 2. As a matter of Law, did the court commit plain error when it failed to dismiss the action under a default and estoppels by silence against the Respondent? 3. As a matter of Law, the court committed plain error and demonstrated bias and prejudice in favor of the Prosecution when it asserted that Petitioner could not answer for other family members or raise any challenge to the Treasurer ’s service by publication because he did not have a “license to practice law in Ohio ” while at the same time ignoring the fact that the assistant prosecutor, as well, does not have an actual “license to practice law in Ohio ” nor does the magistrate have an Oath of Office? 4. As a matter of Law, did the Trial Court commit plain error when it failed to require the Respondent to place jurisdiction and standing on the record when challenged by the Petitioners? The Respondent failed to provide any Constitutional authority for the Complaint and failed to defend it when given the opportunity. i 13 PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINQS Michael Anthony Galluzzo Petitioner in Propria Persona, do P.O. Box 710 St. Paris, Ohio the State [43072] Larry Galluzzo and unknown spouse, Petitioners vs. ROBIN K. EDWARDS, DBA, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY TREASURER, OHIO Respondent Counsel for Respondent Champaign County Prosecutor 200 North Main Street Urbana, Ohio 43078 ii