Whether the Eleventh Circuit improperly applied the certificate of appealability standard by denying relief based on disagreements with other reasonable jurists

1. Did the Eleventh Circuit invert the certificate of appealability standard by basing its denial on disagreements with other reasonable jurists? 2. Could reasonable jurists debate whether Petitioner ’s expert proffer created an issue of fact for a hearing on the connection between his combat -related impairments and the denial of equitable tolling based on his lack of diligence ? 3. Should this Court reconsider “the continued application to death row inmates of the agency theory of the lawyer -client relationship,” Hutchinson v. Florida , 677 F.3d 1097, 1103 (11th Cir. 2012) (Barkett, J., concurring), in the context of missed AEDPA deadlines caused by attorney negligence? ii LIST OF DIRECTLY