No. 24-7092
Michael Dwayne Tryals v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: claims-processing direct-appeal equitable-tolling federal-rule-criminal-procedure mandatory-rules trial-court-violation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) can be remedied on direct appeal, through equitable tolling, or as an exception to mandatory claims processing rules
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal? II. Whether an untimely criminal appeal occasioned b y a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is sub ject to equitable tolling? III. Whether a trial court’s violation of Federal Ru le of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) constitutes unique circumstances under the Court’s case law to warrant an exception to a mandatory claims processi ng rule? -i
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-07
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 29, 2025)
Attorneys
Michael Tryals
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent