No. 24-710
Daniel D. Basile, III v. Illinois
Response Waived
Tags: confession-evidence constitutional-amendments due-process grand-jury judicial-review prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois Supreme Court's holding weakens the shield function of the grand jury process by inappropriately altering the standard for establishing a substantial denial of due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether the Illinois Supreme Court’s holding in this case weakens the shield function of the grand jury process by inappropriately altering the standardfor establishing a substantial denial of due process set forth in United States v. Mechanik and Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States . Whether the appropriate remedy for substantial denials of due process in grand jury proceedings is dismissal of the Indictment withprejudice as a deterrent to prosecutorial misconduct. i
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-30
Waiver of Illinois of right to respond submitted.
2025-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2024-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2025)
Attorneys
Daniel Basile III
Mark Anthony Byrd — Mark A. Byrd, P.C., Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Mark Anthony Byrd — Mark A. Byrd, P.C., Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Illinois