No. 24-7102
Ryan Christopher Armstrong v. United States Federal Government, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-neglect legal-remedy systemic-violation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Copyright Privacy
SocialSecurity Copyright Privacy
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether denying due process to a serial victim of systemic violations over three decades constitutes a violation of constitutional rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Does denying due process to the serial victim of our nation ’s highest crimes who has been repetitively violated for over three decades while being intentionally neglected, sabotaged & violated by our justice & law-enforcement systems violate the constitution? My case is extremely significant to the nation. My case is the first of its kind to my knowledge. My case is a capital case.
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-05-30
Waiver of United States Federal Government, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States Federal Government, et al. to respond filed.
2025-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 30, 2025)
Attorneys
United States Federal Government, et al.
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent