Keziah Thayer v. Vermont Department for Children and Families, DCF, et al.
1. Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars a federal court from hearing a parent's claim for damages arising out of a State's violations of the parent's constitutional rights in the course of, but prior to, obtaining a state court judgment.
2. Whether the Second Circuit erred in holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars Petitioner's claims for damages because they "arise from" rather than were "caused by" a state court judgment.
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars a federal court from hearing a parent's claim for damages arising out of a State's violations of the parent's constitutional rights in the course of, but prior to, obtaining a state court judgment