No. 24-712
Daniel Peterson v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: arbitration-agreements article-iii constitutional-interpretation federal-arbitration-act judicial-oversight public-policy
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities Patent TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities Patent TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court can relinquish Article III duties by deferring to arbitrators when enforcing arbitration awards
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Case No. ___ SS EEE In the Supreme Court of the United States DANIEL PETERSON, Petitioner, v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC. Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Daniel Peterson Pro Se 14064 W. 141st Ter. Olathe, KS 66062 Telephone: (918) 221-5936 —
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-28
Amicus brief of Lift Our Voices submitted.
2025-01-28
Brief amicus curiae of Lift Our Voices filed. (Distributed)
2025-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent Minerva Surgical to respond filed.
2024-11-06
Attorneys
Minerva Surgical
Amber Alyne Eklof — Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Respondent
Amber Alyne Eklof — Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Respondent