No. 24-7123
Carlos Edward Thurman, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court equal-protection firearm-enhancement second-amendment sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's application of the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement was clearly erroneous and whether such enhancement violates equal protection and Second Amendment principles
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
I. Whether the district court clearly erred by applying the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement? Il. Whether general application of the USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1) firearm enhancement and BOP policy violate equal protection and Second Amendment principles? i LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-08
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 2, 2025)
Attorneys
Carlos Thurman
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent