Does Michigan's broader definition of cocaine under state law preclude sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act when compared to federal law's definition?

I. Michigan defines cocaine to include its steroisomers. Federal law defines cocaine to include its optical and geometric isomers. Does Michigan law sweep more broadly than federal law, so that Michigan cocaine convictions should not count to enhance a sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act? II. Does due process require that terms used to define controlled substances be understandable to lay people? III. Should proffer-protected information appear in Presentence Investigation Reports? i STATEMENT OF