No. 24-7154

Michele Kimberly Harris, et vir v. Springfield Housing Authority, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law billing-dispute civil-rights fair-housing-act forma-pauperis judicial-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Judge Beth Phillips correctly ruled on a forma pauperis application and applied appropriate case law in a civil rights dispute involving city utility billing practices

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Weather judge gaddy Granted our forma pauperis correctly, who ruled on this case. a. Did Judge Beth Phillips have a right to otfer rule Judge Gaddy's decision on a default no answer case. b. were plaintiffs filing for forma pauperis met for economic criteria (Watson v. Ault, 525 F.2d 886,891 (5th Cir. 1976) 2. Did the city utilities abuse there power of authority to bill us as customers numerous times in one month.(20CSR 4240-13. 025(Billing Adjustments) 3. Weather Judge Beth Phillips Quoted the wrong case law under Discrimination instead of Civil Rights Fair Housing Act)

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2025)

Attorneys

Michele Harris, et vir.
Michele K. Harris — Petitioner