Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it erroneously allowed the State of Arizona to admit testimonial state-ments and fraudulent evidence through false claims and Arizona Rules of Evidence, thereby introducing them at trial to the jury without proper foundation established by law

No question identified. : T. QuesrzoAis ftegscairgp i ) ~Tmr Qo^r.oA Is HkerHett Th? Tferdt Couttr XT Ffifio^iioosiM ALLoum ThtrSTAffir Of S0Xto^A Me^bfc ('fhfri Umk jum-fGctt "fa CAfa%s^5mmtNkrtM figAUpiiuftrf /?vT.fl<ftif-fi fe^Rv dattff? as CLATto£ f'AuJ:t>An BN #*€ fQaStcO^A,tf lZAL Auf-r-^0 STffT&mms Mtm Mvf Ad Tm lull Ac&ai sr .um\lBmMNMMm£. WTTHouf "fiit PtiafM fauMMvto** ^rAnLtSm 'A? ^TiZTXt :>% 'TU£-3hA¥j ?Dvpk iwg * 2J) $u&s~H6d ±s M££Z£*l2MkML — Atiaagfl 'YmA <T/> 7/P o% f&ACI1£tl iO 'TtirfiMo*iZbL STAif^^rs /V/w IAas Stiftsfcr % CA<^. hrin At I ((SO ITUwfAcf, Of ~fn6n Smrda TH6Z!l.A FMrnfMCP %0A (b)(l) (Due r& Pals?. t Q^PPo^o' 1 Claims ’AUSU V lamBAOjArt Q 'H4f.7&XAL ^uob'F Tks ~Tuts MAT7PX.)jWi£«i Tkeptiapetk Fo&*m7z §j& TF-fFgg. RfTjjn. MRoAf, doz^jg"Ct:^a-t m^AisE Co^T-rrf O #v 7ii£ PP-rrrmmtL fa Tm£ ffi^£6fi9£ ,rMtt^^oAiMAj6i@:J£ A~?W< rrop^c8f \/fig PPfmr^P orfp£ £P1M CA^^QhZLMR tfff ABB£U.MlkIlME33M^^ t * •*