Nantel rs rereed va G Caw, what-73. thedeahp
oo thetcourt may j vest cohe..7 to. the claim———done veda mitsal of Heclajme)——_
LL Rs there Some bent oo 8 ee He -2) Heather assto how. any. leg Heimate
| elatas oP ronfReathnes, ogtrneee floured
eee May, be rarsed befereacewrt hay ATW -— a
dL theclanm th wo Parg wiry or} w Vesttgcttdh)o— ——
3) ihe wjualge hes" personel Loaded oP
dio puted "Saas evtoleat tang Trcts Purds cref 0
Conceruive the DreceedNngs, meu that udgew
15 THEP / (
Preside OUEW A hearing We syne Facts) _.
4) heather a judge. shoulel have recused
CS lAimsel& ecpety HE petition far subsri tate
Alea, fs cnly appellavtte. revit) OF the. [dlects tow aveilalole to chidlenge thar cbecti/2/ 2 oe
. es
i
5) _ co deterdlaur Liles wow -Frivelons Clainrs oF
Daniel. ec tive Pissis Tek na Clousge| iw a Pest sebiecerns
petion Cre aKkrleel motioa) , dees rhe defendaar have
the right Fer aw effective. pre limivecy jvguirgh |
g Lou situates lilee quetavtS, when rne detacdect
has asoertecl therig he te be present (wpevon orvidleo),
sothiet he Mey Present th z merits oF saik LA. C, clarvKs,
dows thar Aefenda "tT have. me rg hr te be present?
. T)D5 Fa Ulewa ble fora jackg ¢.. te perfirar averkig ule
Weal ry wi thour reach ug the moter for LAC, , awd |
Without seme. A fet loge ow The recercA wt the aberves
whe 15 cen cernack of or Phe congplanuat crete?
Whether a judge should have recused himself in a post-conviction petition, and whether a defendant has the right to an effective preliminary inquiry when asserting the right to be present