No. 24-7188
Xzavier Justin Lee Clark v. United States
IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-law firearm-possession marijuana-users second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
SecondAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a statute criminalizing firearm possession by marijuana users violates the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTIONS P RESENTED F OR REVIEW A. Whether Petitioner's conviction for being an unlaw ful user of marijuana in possession of a firearm, under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), must be vacated because the statute is unconstitutional on its face and as applied, in violation of the Second Am endm ent to the United States Constitution? i
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-13
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-08-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-07-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 13, 2025.
2025-07-14
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-07-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 14, 2025 to August 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-06-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 14, 2025.
2025-06-05
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-06-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2025 to July 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 12, 2025)
Attorneys
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Xzavier Clark
Matthew McGavock Robinson — Robinson & Brandt, PSC, Petitioner